Skip to content
Back to blog
🏥
Lottopedia

The Irish Hospitals' Sweepstake: The Charity Lottery Nobody Could Fully Audit

October 20, 202610 min read

For more than half a century a private company in Dublin ran a sweepstake for Irish hospitals that was known far beyond Ireland, and sold most of its tickets in countries where they were banned. Its accounts went to every member of parliament. Yet the one number that mattered - how much buyers actually paid - was never in them. Here is what the parliamentary record shows, and what it means for anyone buying a ticket for a good cause today.

£417,000
prize fund of the first sweep, 1930
22p
per pound in the accounts reached the hospitals, 1975
about ⅓
more sales than declared, a reporter estimated
1987
operating company wound up

A Sunday in January 1973

On 21 January 1973 Dublin's Sunday Independent ran an article headlined "Where the sweep millions go". The reporter was Joe MacAnthony, and it ran to some 8,000 words. Its subject was the Irish Hospitals' Sweepstake: tickets sold across Britain, North America and far beyond on the promise that the money would fund Irish hospitals. MacAnthony's finding, as The Irish Times summed it up in 2011, was that the hospitals had received less than 10 per cent of the money collected.

The new government's reaction was cool. Within weeks of the article Liam Cosgrave became Taoiseach, Ireland's prime minister, and appointed Paddy McGrath to the Senate - the son of Joe McGrath, one of the Sweep's three founders. In May the Minister for Justice, Patrick Cooney, told the Dáil that a review of the Sweep was not a priority for him, and that his answer should not be taken as accepting the article's financial analysis. When a deputy asked in July how much the promoters had been paid in organisation fees since 1930, Cooney pointed him to the accounts in the parliamentary library. Detailing officials to add up the figures going back to 1930, he said, was not a priority.

Anyone trying today to work out whether MacAnthony was right runs into the same problem the deputies did. The answer isn't in the accounts. It sits in a gap in front of them, one the law expressly allowed. That gap is the real reason to look at the Sweep at all, because the same question can be put to any charity lottery.

A Bookmaker, a Former Minister and a Captain

Richard Duggan was a Dublin bookmaker with a history in sweepstakes, lotteries whose winners are tied to the result of a horse race. According to the Dictionary of Irish Biography he ran his first in 1918, for the survivors and dependants of a torpedoed mailboat. Through the 1920s he raised money that way for Dublin hospitals, was convicted in 1924 of running an illegal sweepstake, and in 1927 organised another one anyway, this time from Liechtenstein. His biggest market was Britain.

On 4 June 1930 a law turned it into a legal business. The Public Charitable Hospitals (Temporary Provisions) Act was not a government measure, as the Minister for Justice pointed out that November, but a private members' bill. It let charitable hospitals hold sweepstakes with the Justice Minister's sanction, and it set limits: no more than 30 per cent of the money for expenses, of which no more than 7 per cent for the promoter, and no less than 20 per cent for the hospitals. The operation was run by Duggan's company, Hospitals' Trust Ltd, together with Joe McGrath, a former Minister for Industry and Commerce, and the Welsh-born Captain Spencer Freeman. The first sweep was on the 1930 Manchester November Handicap, and its prize fund reached £417,000 - £317,000 more than the organisers had envisaged.

The Act was set to expire in July 1934. In July 1933 the Public Hospitals Act replaced it. Under that Act and the ones that followed, the surplus from each sweep went into a Hospitals Trust Fund held by trustees whom the minister responsible for health appointed, and the audited accounts of every sweep went to every member of the Oireachtas, Ireland's parliament. On paper it all looked very open.

Sold Where It Was Illegal

The business rested on the fact that almost nobody bought tickets where they were legal. Until the end of 1934, the historian Marie Coleman writes, the Sweep sold the overwhelming majority of its tickets in Britain, where they were illegal. London responded in 1934 with the Betting and Lotteries Act, aimed at curbing sales of Irish tickets, and British income fell sharply. The Sweep sold in North America too, and in the United States the ban that followed the Louisiana Lottery still applied. As late as 1976, according to the former Justice Minister Desmond O'Malley, about 90 per cent of sales were abroad, most of them in North America, Britain and Northern Ireland.

At home the Sweep was an institution. For 30 years it sponsored a nightly programme on Radio Éireann whose main purpose, according to the Dictionary of Irish Biography, was to sell tickets in Britain. The founders invested their profits in Irish companies: in 1932 they bought the Irish Glass Bottle Company, which went on to acquire Waterford Glass in 1950. In 1962 the Sweep's money made the Irish Derby the richest race in Europe at the time, renamed the Irish Sweeps Derby.

Why lotteries were banned in the US

The Number Nobody Audited

The gap is in a short clause that was already in the 1930 Act and was carried over as section 2 of the 1933 Act. It defined the "moneys received from the sale of tickets" that every percentage limit referred to: free tickets given to sellers were left out, and all commissions, prizes and other remuneration for selling were deducted from the face value of every other ticket first. Whatever the agents and sellers kept never appeared in the audited accounts in the first place.

Nobody outside the company knew how big that slice was. That wasn't an outside critic's claim in 1976 but the word of Desmond O'Malley, who had himself been Minister for Justice until 1973 and had to sanction every sweep. He told the Dáil that neither the auditors nor the minister could know the amount of those expenses. He had never been told, and there was no obligation to tell him. He could not prove the clause had been abused, he said, but it was known that substantial payments had been made abroad, quite lawfully. MacAnthony had estimated in 1973 that the real gross takings were about a third higher than the figure in the accounts.

Cooney hit back. Either the newspaper's figure was an invention, he said, or O'Malley had been utterly powerless in office. He himself had demanded information and received enough to be satisfied that nothing illegal was going on. He did not make it public. How much a ticket really brought in remained an open question for the public.

One Sweep, Worked Through

For one sweep the figures can be followed in full: the Cambridgeshire of October 1975, the first at which a ticket cost £2 instead of £1. O'Malley quoted its audited accounts in the Dáil in June 1976.

Cambridgeshire 1975AmountShare
Ticket proceeds as declared in the accounts£3,382,000100.0%
Paid out in prizes£1,331,00039.4%
Paid to the hospitals£741,00021.9%

Ticket proceeds as defined by section 2 of the Public Hospitals Act 1933, i.e. after all selling commissions. The rest went mainly on sellers' prizes, the promoters' expenses and stamp duty. After sellers' prizes, £3,297,230 remained.

So of every pound in the accounts, about 22p reached the hospitals. The arithmetic checks out exactly: since the price rise, at least 30 per cent of net receipts had to go to the hospitals' fund and the state, a quarter of it as stamp duty. Thirty per cent of £3,297,230, three quarters of that - just over £741,000.

If MacAnthony's estimate of a third more in sales is right, buyers hadn't paid £3,382,000 but around £4,509,000. That would make it 16p in the pound, about 33p from a £2 ticket. That's a sum built on an estimate, and without his original article we can't retrace how MacAnthony arrived at "less than 10 per cent". But it shows how much rode on the unknown figure: depending on the assumption, the good cause's share is a fifth, a sixth or less.

What the Hospitals Got - and the Promoters

In fairness, the ledger has another side. Up to and including the sweep on the 1975 Irish Sweeps Hurdle, the Justice Minister said, the hospitals' fund had received over £81.5 million in all. In 1985 the Minister for Health put the total paid to the health services from 1930 to 1984 at almost £105 million. Even O'Malley accepted that the post-war hospital building programme couldn't have happened without the Sweep money saved up during the war. For 1976, though, he put the contribution at a little over 1 per cent of Irish health spending.

The promoters' officially declared fees, by contrast, were modest: O'Malley put the organisation and management fee up to about the end of 1973 at slightly over £10 million, about 2 per cent of proceeds by Cooney's account. O'Malley added that this was apart from any other income the promoters might draw from the Sweep. The expenses the promoters charged ran at about a quarter of net receipts until 1973. Then they rose while sales fell, with US states and Canada now running lotteries of their own:

SweepPromoters' expenses
Each sweep up to 1973about 25%
Cambridgeshire 197432.46%
Irish Sweeps Hurdle 197432.19%
Lincoln 197534.44%
Irish Sweeps Derby 197535.68%
Cambridgeshire 1975 (first £2 ticket)30.05%
Irish Sweeps Hurdle 197534.25%

Share of net receipts in the audited accounts, excluding the management fee. Legal limit: 30 per cent. Source: Justice Minister Patrick Cooney in the Dáil, 16 June 1976.

Anything above 30 per cent the promoters had to absorb themselves. Rather than let the Sweep close, with nearly a thousand jobs depending on it at the time, parliament raised the limit to 40 per cent in 1976. The share for the hospitals and the state went up to at least 30 per cent, and the prize pot shrank accordingly.

The End Came With the State Lottery

On 17 October 1985 the Irish government announced its decision to set up a national lottery. It would be run not by the Sweep but by a subsidiary of the post office, An Post. The company held its last traditional sweep, on the Irish Sweeps Hurdle, in January 1986. That same month it laid off around 200 staff, most of them women, a deputy told the Dáil, many with 30 or 40 years' service. The Justice Minister turned down a plan for fortnightly sweeps because it would duplicate the new lottery. In March 1987 Hospitals' Trust (1940) Ltd went into voluntary liquidation.

Part of the story was lost along the way, quite literally. Joe McGrath's private papers were kept in the Hospitals Trust building in Ballsbridge. When the River Dodder burst its banks in August 1986, they were destroyed.

The state lottery that started in 1987 is best known to players today for Irish Lotto. The principle hasn't changed: part of every stake pays for good causes. What's different is who does the counting.

The history of Irish Lotto

What It Means for Players Today

Today Ireland's National Lottery Act of 2013 requires at least 50 per cent of sales to be paid out in prizes on average each year, and the licence sends 65 per cent of what's left after prizes to good causes. In 2023 that came to €227.9 million - almost 30 cents of every euro spent, measured against total sales. The Sweep's lesson applies to any lottery that sells itself on a good cause:

  • 1Ask what share reaches the cause, and of what. A charity lottery's percentage means little unless you know whether it is measured against everything players paid or against a figure left over after sellers and agents were paid. The Sweep's best-documented draw gave the hospitals 22 pence of every pound in the accounts; how much of every pound actually paid, nobody outside the company could say.
  • 2Ask who checks. Accounts that are published but built on a number nobody audits look transparent without being so. Today's Irish National Lottery has a regulator whose officials check the split between prizes and good causes every week, game by game. That is the difference that matters, not the size of the advertised percentage.
  • 3Read the prize terms. The Sweep's advertised £400,000 super prize was paid as £75,000 in cash and an annuity for the rest. The minister called it a tax measure for winners, said the full amount was guaranteed, and had no doubt a winner who wanted it all in cash could be accommodated. Many lotteries still advertise a headline figure that differs from the cash on offer.

How Would Your Numbers Have Done?

Our checker runs your numbers against thousands of real draws and shows you what they would have won - and what you would have paid to play them.

Sources: Public Charitable Hospitals (Temporary Provisions) Act 1930, sections 5, 9 and 11, and Public Hospitals Act 1933, sections 2, 4, 12, 13, 20 and 23 (Irish Statute Book); Dáil debates (Oireachtas) of 26 November 1930 (Justice Minister Fitzgerald-Kenney), 10 May and 5 July 1973 (Justice Minister Cooney), 16 June 1976 (second stage of the Public Hospitals (Amendment) Bill: Cooney, O'Malley and others, with the figures from the 1972-1975 accounts), 20 November 1985 (Health Minister Desmond), 28 January 1986 (Labour Minister Quinn), 18 February and 2 December 1986 (Justice Minister Dukes, Deputy V. Brady), 8 December 1987 (Health Minister O'Hanlon); Dictionary of Irish Biography entries on Richard Joseph Duggan (Marie Coleman), Spencer Freeman and Joseph McGrath; Marie Coleman, "The Irish Hospitals Sweepstake in the United States of America, 1930-39", Irish Historical Studies 35 (2006); Joe Joyce, "Then & Now: Joe MacAnthony", The Irish Times, 5 March 2011; Joe MacAnthony, "Where the sweep millions go", Sunday Independent, 21 January 1973 (as cited by the DIB, The Irish Times and the Dáil record); Government of Ireland (gov.ie), press release on the National Lottery Good Causes Report 2023 (27 December 2024). Pound amounts are Irish pounds at the time, not adjusted for inflation; shares are our own calculation.

Disclaimer: Gambling can be addictive. Play responsibly. Participation from 18 years. This article is for informational purposes only.

More on this topic

Back to blog